Ad is loading...
CCGEX vs RNPEX
CCGEX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPEX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$12.62
Change+$0.08 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.01M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$62.18
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.81B
CCGEX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. CCGEX (131M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPEX (0.55) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPEX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. CCGEX (-3.44). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.11 vs. CCGEX (32.15).
| CCGEX | RNPEX | CCGEX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.76 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.76 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.020 | 2.085 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 5.60 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.47 | 28.15 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.15 | 46.11 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.40 | 63.18 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...