Ad is loading...
CCGEX vs RNPEX
CCGEX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPEX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$11.53
Change+$0.08 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.71M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$57.42
Change+$0.30 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.19B
CCGEX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPEX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. CCGEX (120M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPEX (0.56) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPEX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.03 vs. CCGEX (-8.42). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.63 vs. CCGEX (26.56).
| CCGEX | RNPEX | CCGEX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.76 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.76 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.569 | -5.730 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.42 | 1.03 | -814% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.13 | 3.77 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.56 | 39.63 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.78 | 52.78 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...