Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPEX
CCGEX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPEX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$14.45
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.04M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$69.82
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
CCGEX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. CCGEX (152M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPEX (0.49) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPEX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.94 vs. CCGEX (7.68). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.27 vs. CCGEX (25.76).
| CCGEX | RNPEX | CCGEX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.76 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.76 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.333 | 14.628 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 16.94 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.66 | 44.81 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.76 | 42.27 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.42 | 85.67 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement