Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPFX
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPFX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$14.45
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.04M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.24
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. CCGEX (152M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPFX (0.74) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.38 vs. CCGEX (7.68). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.12 vs. CCGEX (25.76).
| CCGEX | RNPFX | CCGEX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.46 | 467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.46 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.333 | 14.829 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 17.38 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.66 | 45.93 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.76 | 44.12 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.42 | 88.70 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers