Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPFX
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPFX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$13.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.22M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$67.49
Change+$0.35 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.96B
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. CCGEX (142M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPFX (0.77) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. CCGEX (-1.03). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.97 vs. CCGEX (25.14).
| CCGEX | RNPFX | CCGEX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.46 | 467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.46 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.804 | 8.785 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142M | 150B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.77 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.03 | 11.29 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.72 | 30.66 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.14 | 44.97 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.44 | 78.45 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement