Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPFX
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPFX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$14.51
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.66M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.44
Change-$0.08 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. CCGEX (157M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPFX (0.69) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGEX (19 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.05 vs. CCGEX (0.48). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.33 vs. CCGEX (9.92).
| CCGEX | RNPFX | CCGEX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.46 | 467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.46 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.804 | 16.763 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | 12.05 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.82 | 47.14 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.92 | 28.33 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.99 | 90.02 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement