Ad is loading...
CCGEX vs RNPFX
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPFX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$12.62
Change+$0.08 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.01M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$63.40
Change+$0.14 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.81B
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. CCGEX (131M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPFX (0.82) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. CCGEX (-3.44). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.99 vs. CCGEX (32.15).
| CCGEX | RNPFX | CCGEX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.46 | 467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.46 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.020 | 2.192 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 6.00 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.47 | 29.14 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.15 | 47.99 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.40 | 65.80 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers