Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPFX
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPFX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$14.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.96M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a StrongBuy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. CCGEX (154M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPFX (0.74) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGEX (18 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.98 vs. CCGEX (4.43). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.70 vs. CCGEX (21.93).
| CCGEX | RNPFX | CCGEX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.46 | 467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.46 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.667 | 15.587 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.43 | 13.98 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.12 | 35.34 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.93 | 39.70 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.09 | 89.56 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers