Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGEX vs RNPFX
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGEX vs RNPFX
Calamos Global Equity C
Price$15.11
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.39M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$73.36
Change+$0.27 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.39B
CCGEX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGEX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGEX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. CCGEX (158M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: RNPFX (0.72) vs CCGEX (0.00). CCGEX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGEX (19 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CCGEX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. CCGEX (5.55). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.27 vs. CCGEX (23.10).
| CCGEX | RNPFX | CCGEX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.46 | 467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.46 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.882 | 17.811 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 11.53 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.80 | 63.97 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.10 | 39.27 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.35 | 105.15 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement