Advertisement
CCGFF vs RWAY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGFF is a Hold and RWAY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCGFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRWAY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCGFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RWAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RWAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- RWAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CCGFF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RWAY (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.99%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
RWAY is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-3.30% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
@Investment Managers (-2.52% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| CCGFF | RWAY | CCGFF / RWAY | |
| Capitalization | 574M | 328M | 175% |
| EBITDA | 178M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -4.991 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 22.21 | 6.22 | 357% |
| Revenue | 474M | 68.2M | 695% |
| Total Cash | 56.7M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 424M | 516M | 82% |
| CCGFF | RWAY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 3% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 36% |
Advertisement
CCGFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCGFF and ZIZTF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCGFF and ZIZTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCGFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCGFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZIZTF - CCGFF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AIFLF - CCGFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DWAY - CCGFF | 0% Poorly correlated | -22.45% | ||
| SHGKY - CCGFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RWAY - CCGFF | -0% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
More | ||||
RWAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RWAY has been closely correlated with MFIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RWAY jumps, then MFIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RWAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWAY | 100% | -2.47% | ||
| MFIC - RWAY | 70% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| CSWC - RWAY | 68% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| BCSF - RWAY | 67% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| TSLX - RWAY | 67% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| CGBD - RWAY | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||