CCGFF
Price
$10.12
Change
-$6.09 (-37.57%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
693.82M
RWAY
Price
$10.30
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
373.76M
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCGFF vs RWAY

Header iconCCGFF vs RWAY Comparison
Open Charts CCGFF vs RWAYBanner chart's image
Credit Corp Group
Price$10.12
Change-$6.09 (-37.57%)
Volume$500
Capitalization693.82M
Runway Growth Finance
Price$10.30
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$1.48K
Capitalization373.76M
CCGFF vs RWAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCGFF vs. RWAY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGFF is a Hold and RWAY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CCGFF: $10.12 vs. RWAY: $10.32)
Brand notoriety: CCGFF and RWAY are both not notable
CCGFF represents the Savings Banks, while RWAY is part of the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCGFF: 100% vs. RWAY: 90%
Market capitalization -- CCGFF: $693.82M vs. RWAY: $373.76M
CCGFF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $693.82M. RWAY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $373.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $650.08B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.86B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCGFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRWAY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCGFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RWAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RWAY is a better buy in the long-term than CCGFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RWAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RWAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CCGFF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RWAY (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.83%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

RWAY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.07% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGFF($694M) has a higher market cap than RWAY($374M). CCGFF has higher P/E ratio than RWAY: CCGFF (22.21) vs RWAY (5.49). RWAY YTD gains are higher at: 4.366 vs. CCGFF (0.000). CCGFF has less debt than RWAY: CCGFF (424M) vs RWAY (516M). CCGFF has higher revenues than RWAY: CCGFF (474M) vs RWAY (84.5M).
CCGFFRWAYCCGFF / RWAY
Capitalization694M374M186%
EBITDA178MN/A-
Gain YTD0.0004.366-
P/E Ratio22.215.49405%
Revenue474M84.5M561%
Total Cash56.7MN/A-
Total Debt424M516M82%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCGFFRWAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RWAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGPIX113.45N/A
N/A
ProFunds Small Cap Growth Inv
SPFAX30.56N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth A
FMCSX44.97N/A
N/A
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock
DASCX19.04N/A
N/A
Dean Small Cap Value
CMLIX52.17N/A
N/A
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional

CCGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCGFF and ZIZTF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCGFF and ZIZTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCGFF
1D Price
Change %
CCGFF100%
N/A
ZIZTF - CCGFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIFLF - CCGFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DWAY - CCGFF
0%
Poorly correlated
+21.16%
SHGKY - CCGFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RWAY - CCGFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More

RWAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RWAY has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RWAY jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RWAY
1D Price
Change %
RWAY100%
+0.68%
OBDC - RWAY
71%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
BCSF - RWAY
70%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
PNNT - RWAY
67%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
MFIC - RWAY
67%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
TSLX - RWAY
67%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
More