Ad is loading...
CCGIX vs RNPCX
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs RNPCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$22.62
Change+$1.54 (+7.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets333.25M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$56.68
Change+$4.13 (+7.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.54B
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. RNPCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. CCGIX (333M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than RNPCX: CCGIX (0.29) vs RNPCX (0.26). CCGIX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: CCGIX (9 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). RNPCX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.88). RNPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (14.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: RNPCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.16 vs. RNPCX (-10.12). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 65.04 vs. RNPCX (33.48).
| CCGIX | RNPCX | CCGIX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.791 | -12.519 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 333M | 123B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.26 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.16 | -10.12 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.30 | -6.69 | -94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.04 | 33.48 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers