Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs RNPCX
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs RNPCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$26.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.3M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$68.07
Change+$0.54 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.4B
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. RNPCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a StrongBuy and RNPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. CCGIX (412M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than RNPCX: CCGIX (0.27) vs RNPCX (0.22). CCGIX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: CCGIX (9 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). RNPCX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.86). RNPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: RNPCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). RNPCX (18.12) and CCGIX (17.89) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 59.75 vs. RNPCX (35.11).
| CCGIX | RNPCX | CCGIX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.06 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.987 | 13.318 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 412M | 155B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.22 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.89 | 18.12 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 35.16 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.75 | 35.11 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement