Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs RNPCX
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs RNPCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$25.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.24M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$64.95
Change-$0.24 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.71B
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. RNPCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. CCGIX (405M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than RNPCX: CCGIX (0.27) vs RNPCX (0.24). CCGIX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: CCGIX (9 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). RNPCX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.86). RNPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: RNPCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. RNPCX (8.76). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 67.64 vs. RNPCX (41.20).
| CCGIX | RNPCX | CCGIX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.06 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.295 | 8.523 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 405M | 151B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.24 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 8.76 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.46 | 28.16 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.64 | 41.20 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement