Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGIX vs RNPCX
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts CCGIX vs RNPCX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
Price$27.72
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.42M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$70.81
Change-$0.20 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
CCGIX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGIX vs. RNPCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGIX is a StrongBuy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CCGIX (436M). CCGIX pays higher dividends than RNPCX: CCGIX (0.26) vs RNPCX (0.22). CCGIX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: CCGIX (9 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). RNPCX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CCGIX (0.86). RNPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGIX (15.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: RNPCX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. RNPCX (14.27). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 67.56 vs. RNPCX (36.91).
| CCGIX | RNPCX | CCGIX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.06 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.970 | 17.879 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.22 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 14.27 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.99 | 50.27 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.56 | 36.91 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement