Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs RNPFX
CCGSX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs RNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$25.59
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.5M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$70.17
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
CCGSX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. CCGSX (411M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: RNPFX (0.74) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGSX (9 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. CCGSX (8.44). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.45 vs. RNPFX (47.33).
| CCGSX | RNPFX | CCGSX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.46 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.46 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.640 | 13.104 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 411M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.74 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 11.57 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.70 | 47.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.45 | 47.33 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.89 | - |