Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs RNPFX
CCGSX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs RNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$25.72
Change+$0.14 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.9M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$70.35
Change+$0.45 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.52B
CCGSX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. CCGSX (412M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: RNPFX (0.74) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGSX (9 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.00 vs. CCGSX (9.13). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.89 vs. RNPFX (42.32).
| CCGSX | RNPFX | CCGSX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.46 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.46 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.597 | 13.395 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 412M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.74 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | 12.00 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.50 | 47.51 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.89 | 42.32 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers