Ad is loading...
CCGTX vs FAUTX
CCGTX vs FAUTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. FAUTX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and FAUTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX (44.3B) and FAUTX (44.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FAUTX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: FAUTX (1.27) vs CCGTX (0.56). CCGTX was incepted earlier than FAUTX: CCGTX (11 years) vs FAUTX (11 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FAUTX (0.72). CCGTX (6.00) and FAUTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCGTX (250) and FAUTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FAUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. CCGTX (5.80). FAUTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.65 vs. CCGTX (39.92).
| CCGTX | FAUTX | CCGTX / FAUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.154 | 1.383 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.3B | 44.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.27 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 6.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.59 | 24.54 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.92 | 43.65 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.00 | 58.28 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers