Ad is loading...
CCGTX vs RBEKX
CCGTX vs RBEKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. RBEKX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and RBEKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX (44.3B) and RBEKX (44.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RBEKX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: RBEKX (0.86) vs CCGTX (0.56). CCGTX was incepted earlier than RBEKX: CCGTX (11 years) vs RBEKX (11 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RBEKX (1.16). CCGTX (6.00) and RBEKX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCGTX (250) and RBEKX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RBEKX (6.08) and CCGTX (5.80) have marching annual gain over last year. RBEKX (41.32) and CCGTX (39.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCGTX | RBEKX | CCGTX / RBEKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.16 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.16 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.154 | 1.199 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.3B | 44.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.86 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 6.08 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.59 | 23.24 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.92 | 41.32 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.00 | 54.13 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers