Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs RBKTX
CCGTX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. RBKTX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX (46.6B) and RBKTX (46.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RBKTX (0.55) and CCGTX (0.53) have matching dividends . CCGTX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: CCGTX (11 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) and CCGTX (1.42) have similar cost to investors . CCGTX (6.00) and RBKTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCGTX (250) and RBKTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCGTX (8.98) and RBKTX (8.94) have marching annual gain over last year. CCGTX (40.90) and RBKTX (40.69) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCGTX | RBKTX | CCGTX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.45 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.45 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.322 | 6.300 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.6B | 46.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.55 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.98 | 8.94 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.67 | 34.53 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.90 | 40.69 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.43 | 62.12 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers