Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs RCKTX
CCGTX vs RCKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. RCKTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and RCKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX (45.4B) and RCKTX (45.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RCKTX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: RCKTX (0.98) vs CCGTX (0.56). CCGTX was incepted earlier than RCKTX: CCGTX (11 years) vs RCKTX (18 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RCKTX (1.00). CCGTX (6.00) and RCKTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCGTX (250) and RCKTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. CCGTX (7.49). RCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.95 vs. CCGTX (41.62).
| CCGTX | RCKTX | CCGTX / RCKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.00 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.00 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.362 | 3.522 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 45.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.98 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | 7.94 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.23 | 25.46 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.62 | 43.95 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.11 | 60.07 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers