Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGTX vs RFGTX
CCGTX vs RFGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. RFGTX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and RFGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX (50B) and RFGTX (50B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RFGTX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: RFGTX (1.40) vs CCGTX (0.50). CCGTX was incepted earlier than RFGTX: CCGTX (12 years) vs RFGTX (16 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RFGTX (0.36). CCGTX (6.00) and RFGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCGTX (250) and RFGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.62 vs. CCGTX (13.38). RFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.24 vs. CCGTX (38.50).
| CCGTX | RFGTX | CCGTX / RFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.36 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.36 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.852 | 15.661 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50B | 50B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.40 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.38 | 14.62 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.15 | 46.69 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.50 | 44.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.96 | 96.30 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers