Ad is loading...
CCGTX vs RHGTX
CCGTX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGTX vs. RHGTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGTX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCGTX (43.6B) and RHGTX (43.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RHGTX pays higher dividends than CCGTX: RHGTX (1.47) vs CCGTX (0.56). CCGTX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: CCGTX (11 years) vs RHGTX (9 years). CCGTX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RHGTX (0.50). CCGTX (6.00) and RHGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCGTX (250) and RHGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RHGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. CCGTX (5.63). RHGTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.12 vs. CCGTX (37.33).
| CCGTX | RHGTX | CCGTX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.50 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.50 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.853 | -0.541 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 43.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.47 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 6.66 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.72 | 18.14 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.33 | 42.12 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...