CCHGY
Price
$50.38
Change
-$0.08 (-0.16%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
18.27B
47 days until earnings call
CCOJF
Price
$12.88
Change
-$0.24 (-1.83%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCHGY vs CCOJF

Header iconCCHGY vs CCOJF Comparison
Open Charts CCHGY vs CCOJFBanner chart's image
Coca-Cola HBC AG
Price$50.38
Change-$0.08 (-0.16%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization18.27B
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan
Price$12.88
Change-$0.24 (-1.83%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.06B
CCHGY vs CCOJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCHGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCHGY vs. CCOJF commentary
Sep 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCHGY is a StrongBuy and CCOJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CCHGY: $50.38 vs. CCOJF: $12.88)
Brand notoriety: CCHGY and CCOJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCHGY: 23% vs. CCOJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CCHGY: $18.27B vs. CCOJF: $3.06B
CCHGY [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $18.27B. CCOJF’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $288.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCHGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCHGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCOJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCHGY is a better buy in the long-term than CCOJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCHGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCHGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CCHGY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.18% price change this week, while CCOJF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCHGY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.49% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCHGY($18.3B) has a higher market cap than CCOJF($3.06B). CCOJF has higher P/E ratio than CCHGY: CCOJF (66.35) vs CCHGY (17.15). CCHGY YTD gains are higher at: 58.778 vs. CCOJF (0.000). CCHGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.77B vs. CCOJF (-34.49B). CCOJF has more cash in the bank: 45.3B vs. CCHGY (2.68B). CCHGY has less debt than CCOJF: CCHGY (4.35B) vs CCOJF (133B). CCOJF has higher revenues than CCHGY: CCOJF (899B) vs CCHGY (11.2B).
CCHGYCCOJFCCHGY / CCOJF
Capitalization18.3B3.06B598%
EBITDA1.77B-34.49B-5%
Gain YTD58.7780.000-
P/E Ratio17.1566.3526%
Revenue11.2B899B1%
Total Cash2.68B45.3B6%
Total Debt4.35B133B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCHGY vs CCOJF: Fundamental Ratings
CCHGY
CCOJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5338
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27100
SMR RATING
1..100
3497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5072
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCHGY's Valuation (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJF (91). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CCHGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCOJF (100). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CCHGY's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJF (97). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CCHGY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOJF (72). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew similarly to CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CCHGY's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOJF (97). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew similarly to CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCHGYCCOJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCHGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVDU120.881.14
+0.95%
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares
MINT100.490.05
+0.05%
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
HYTI19.94N/A
N/A
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
XMPT21.77-0.02
-0.07%
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
CVAR27.73-0.22
-0.79%
Cultivar ETF

CCOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOJF and CCHGY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOJF and CCHGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOJF
1D Price
Change %
CCOJF100%
N/A
CCHGY - CCOJF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
BRFH - CCOJF
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.99%
CELH - CCOJF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
KDP - CCOJF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
CHFHY - CCOJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More