CCHGY
Price
$44.59
Change
-$0.58 (-1.28%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.16B
25 days until earnings call
CCOJF
Price
$12.88
Change
-$0.24 (-1.83%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCHGY vs CCOJF

Header iconCCHGY vs CCOJF Comparison
Open Charts CCHGY vs CCOJFBanner chart's image
Coca-Cola HBC AG
Price$44.59
Change-$0.58 (-1.28%)
Volume$8.61K
Capitalization16.16B
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan
Price$12.88
Change-$0.24 (-1.83%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.92B
CCHGY vs CCOJF Comparison Chart in %
CCHGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCHGY vs. CCOJF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCHGY is a Hold and CCOJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CCHGY: $44.59 vs. CCOJF: $12.88)
Brand notoriety: CCHGY and CCOJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCHGY: 136% vs. CCOJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CCHGY: $16.16B vs. CCOJF: $2.92B
CCHGY [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $16.16B. CCOJF’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $2.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $286.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCHGY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCHGY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CCOJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCHGY is a better buy in the long-term than CCOJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCHGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCHGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CCHGY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -7.95% price change this week, while CCOJF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCHGY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.89% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCHGY($16.2B) has a higher market cap than CCOJF($2.92B). CCOJF has higher P/E ratio than CCHGY: CCOJF (66.35) vs CCHGY (15.33). CCHGY YTD gains are higher at: 40.530 vs. CCOJF (0.000). CCHGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.77B vs. CCOJF (-34.49B). CCOJF has more cash in the bank: 45.3B vs. CCHGY (2.68B). CCHGY has less debt than CCOJF: CCHGY (4.35B) vs CCOJF (133B). CCOJF has higher revenues than CCHGY: CCOJF (899B) vs CCHGY (11.2B).
CCHGYCCOJFCCHGY / CCOJF
Capitalization16.2B2.92B556%
EBITDA1.77B-34.49B-5%
Gain YTD40.5300.000-
P/E Ratio15.3366.3523%
Revenue11.2B899B1%
Total Cash2.68B45.3B6%
Total Debt4.35B133B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCHGY vs CCOJF: Fundamental Ratings
CCHGY
CCOJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
3497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6172
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7598
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCHGY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJF (94). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CCHGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCOJF (100). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CCHGY's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJF (97). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CCHGY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOJF (72). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew similarly to CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CCHGY's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOJF (98). This means that CCHGY’s stock grew similarly to CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCHGYCCOJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCHGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETJ8.900.04
+0.45%
Eaton Vance Risk - Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
SUB106.680.04
+0.04%
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bd ETF
FLXR39.700.01
+0.03%
TCW Flexible Income ETF
CANQ30.04-0.17
-0.55%
Calamos Nasdaq® Equity & Income ETF
TUR33.74-0.71
-2.06%
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF

CCHGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCHGY and CCOJF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCHGY and CCOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCHGY
1D Price
Change %
CCHGY100%
-1.27%
CCOJF - CCHGY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCEP - CCHGY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
CELH - CCHGY
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
KDP - CCHGY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
CCOJY - CCHGY
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.27%
More

CCOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOJF and CCHGY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOJF and CCHGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOJF
1D Price
Change %
CCOJF100%
N/A
CCHGY - CCOJF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
BRFH - CCOJF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CELH - CCOJF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
KDP - CCOJF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
CHFHY - CCOJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More