CCIX
Price
$10.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
384.59M
CUB
Price
$10.51
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
322.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCIX vs CUB

Header iconCCIX vs CUB Comparison
Open Charts CCIX vs CUBBanner chart's image
Churchill Capital Corp IX
Price$10.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$97.66K
Capitalization384.59M
Lionheart Holdings
Price$10.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$350
Capitalization322.31M
CCIX vs CUB Comparison Chart in %
CCIX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCIX vs. CUB commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIX is a Hold and CUB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CCIX: $10.49 vs. CUB: $10.51)
Brand notoriety: CCIX and CUB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCIX: 118% vs. CUB: 1%
Market capitalization -- CCIX: $384.59M vs. CUB: $322.74M
CCIX [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $384.59M. CUB’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $322.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.79M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCIX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCUB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCIX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUB is a better buy in the long-term than CCIX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCIX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CUB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCIX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CUB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CUB is a better buy in the short-term than CCIX.

Price Growth

CCIX (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while CUB (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +76.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.31% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIX($385M) has a higher market cap than CUB($322M). CUB YTD gains are higher at: 4.059 vs. CCIX (1.845). CUB has more cash in the bank: 569K vs. CCIX (426K).
CCIXCUBCCIX / CUB
Capitalization385M322M120%
EBITDA-3.13MN/A-
Gain YTD1.8454.05945%
P/E Ratio45.27N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash426K569K75%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUB: Fundamental Ratings
CUB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCIXCUB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
8%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCIX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KLDCF1.560.08
+5.41%
Kenorland Minerals Ltd.
CKNHF48.10N/A
N/A
Clarkson Horace Plc
MNBEF14.05N/A
N/A
Minebea Mitsumi Inc.
VCISY34.59-0.13
-0.37%
Vinci SA
NXTDF0.33-0.02
-6.67%
NextGen Digital Platforms Inc.

CCIX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCIX and FSHP have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCIX and FSHP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCIX
1D Price
Change %
CCIX100%
N/A
FSHP - CCIX
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FACT - CCIX
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
CUB - CCIX
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
CEP - CCIX
12%
Poorly correlated
+5.10%
FSHPU - CCIX
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUB and MBAV have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUB and MBAV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUB
1D Price
Change %
CUB100%
-0.13%
MBAV - CUB
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
CCIX - CUB
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRAF - CUB
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTH - CUB
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
HYAC - CUB
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
More