CCIX
Price
$10.73
Change
+$0.11 (+1.04%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
393.39M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
CUB
Price
$10.55
Change
+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
323.53M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCIX vs CUB

Header iconCCIX vs CUB Comparison
Open Charts CCIX vs CUBBanner chart's image
Churchill Capital Corp IX
Price$10.73
Change+$0.11 (+1.04%)
Volume$27.98K
Capitalization393.39M
Lionheart Holdings
Price$10.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Volume$190
Capitalization323.53M
CCIX vs CUB Comparison Chart in %
CCIX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCIX vs. CUB commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIX is a Hold and CUB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CCIX: $10.73 vs. CUB: $10.55)
Brand notoriety: CCIX and CUB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCIX: 21% vs. CUB: 2%
Market capitalization -- CCIX: $393.39M vs. CUB: $323.53M
CCIX [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $393.39M. CUB’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $323.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $182.99M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCIX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCUB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCIX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CUB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CCIX and CUB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCIX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CUB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCIX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CUB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CCIX and CUB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CCIX (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.65% price change this week, while CUB (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +6.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+6.85% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIX($393M) has a higher market cap than CUB($324M). CUB YTD gains are higher at: 4.455 vs. CCIX (4.175). CUB has more cash in the bank: 569K vs. CCIX (426K).
CCIXCUBCCIX / CUB
Capitalization393M324M121%
EBITDA-3.13MN/A-
Gain YTD4.1754.45594%
P/E Ratio46.31N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash426K569K75%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUB: Fundamental Ratings
CUB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
34

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCIXCUB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
7%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCIX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSWV16.200.07
+0.45%
Main Street Financial Services Corp.
AITUF11.94N/A
N/A
Anritsu Corp.
THNPF40.93N/A
N/A
Technip Energies NV
CHGCY23.48-0.08
-0.34%
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
TCNB6.02-0.03
-0.54%
Town Center Bank (IL)

CCIX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCIX and FACT have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCIX and FACT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCIX
1D Price
Change %
CCIX100%
+1.04%
FACT - CCIX
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUB - CCIX
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
CEP - CCIX
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
FSHP - CCIX
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TACO - CCIX
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUB and MBAV have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUB and MBAV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUB
1D Price
Change %
CUB100%
+0.19%
MBAV - CUB
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCIX - CUB
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
GRAF - CUB
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
KTH - CUB
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
MLACU - CUB
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More