CCIX
Price
$10.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
384.59M
FACT
Price
$10.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
250.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCIX vs FACT

Header iconCCIX vs FACT Comparison
Open Charts CCIX vs FACTBanner chart's image
Churchill Capital Corp IX
Price$10.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$97.66K
Capitalization384.59M
Fact II Acquisition
Price$10.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization250.75M
CCIX vs FACT Comparison Chart in %
CCIX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCIX vs. FACT commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIX is a Hold and FACT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CCIX: $10.49 vs. FACT: $10.31)
Brand notoriety: CCIX and FACT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCIX: 118% vs. FACT: 3%
Market capitalization -- CCIX: $384.59M vs. FACT: $250.75M
CCIX [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $384.59M. FACT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $250.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.79M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCIX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFACT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCIX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FACT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CCIX and FACT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCIX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FACT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCIX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FACT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FACT is a better buy in the short-term than CCIX.

Price Growth

CCIX (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while FACT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +76.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.31% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIX($385M) has a higher market cap than FACT($251M). FACT YTD gains are higher at: 4.141 vs. CCIX (1.845). FACT has more cash in the bank: 1.09M vs. CCIX (426K).
CCIXFACTCCIX / FACT
Capitalization385M251M153%
EBITDA-3.13MN/A-
Gain YTD1.8454.14145%
P/E Ratio45.27N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash426K1.09M39%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCIXFACT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
4%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCIX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPRKY8.700.34
+4.03%
Travis Perkins Plc
SRGHY16.270.14
+0.84%
Shoprite Holdings Ltd.
ATSKF0.88N/A
N/A
Allied Telesis Holdings KK
NSRGY93.01-0.34
-0.36%
Nestle S.A.
SCPCF0.29-0.01
-2.27%
SCOPE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

CCIX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCIX and FSHP have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCIX and FSHP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCIX
1D Price
Change %
CCIX100%
N/A
FSHP - CCIX
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FACT - CCIX
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
CUB - CCIX
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
CEP - CCIX
12%
Poorly correlated
+5.10%
FSHPU - CCIX
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACT and PLMIU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACT and PLMIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACT
1D Price
Change %
FACT100%
+0.05%
PLMIU - FACT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAYAU - FACT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORT - FACT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTAF - FACT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCIX - FACT
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More