Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs FELCX
CCIZX vs FELCX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs FELCX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$125.74
Change+$4.44 (+3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.36B
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors C
Price$51.92
Change+$2.75 (+5.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.45B
CCIZX vs FELCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. FELCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and FELCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. FELCX (2.45B). CCIZX (0.00) and FELCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than FELCX: CCIZX (15 years) vs FELCX (24 years). FELCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FELCX (30.00). FELCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: FELCX (0) vs CCIZX (2000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.23 vs. FELCX (-13.89). FELCX return over 5 years is better than : 138.46 vs. CCIZX (53.41).
| CCIZX | FELCX | CCIZX / FELCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.70 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.70 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.201 | -23.399 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 2.45B | 465% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.23 | -13.89 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.62 | 39.21 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.41 | 138.46 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.82 | 230.44 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...