Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs KTCAX
CCIZX vs KTCAX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs KTCAX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$121.30
Change+$3.23 (+2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.06B
DWS Science and Technology A
Price$33.34
Change+$0.96 (+2.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
CCIZX vs KTCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. KTCAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and KTCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. KTCAX (1.5B). CCIZX (0.00) and KTCAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than KTCAX: CCIZX (15 years) vs KTCAX (77 years). CCIZX (0.93) and KTCAX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. KTCAX (27.00). KTCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: KTCAX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). KTCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.30 vs. CCIZX (-12.22). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 49.32 vs. KTCAX (34.13).
| CCIZX | KTCAX | CCIZX / KTCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.90 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.90 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 77 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.379 | -17.566 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 1.5B | 741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.22 | -7.30 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.45 | 15.23 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.32 | 34.13 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.35 | 81.70 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...