Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs NWHQX
CCIZX vs NWHQX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHQX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$150.20
Change-$4.77 (-3.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.28B
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci M
Price$31.47
Change-$0.96 (-2.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.05M
CCIZX vs NWHQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHQX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and NWHQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. NWHQX (188M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHQX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHQX: CCIZX (14 years) vs NWHQX (24 years). NWHQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.71 vs. CCIZX (13.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHQX: CCIZX (2000) vs NWHQX (5000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.85 vs. NWHQX (4.27). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 62.12 vs. NWHQX (29.61).
| CCIZX | NWHQX | CCIZX / NWHQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.288 | 4.586 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.3B | 188M | 7,606% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.85 | 4.27 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.27 | 24.58 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.12 | 29.61 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.40 | 78.04 | 176% |