Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs NWHQX
CCIZX vs NWHQX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs NWHQX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$122.72
Change+$0.37 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.51B
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci M
Price$25.81
Change-$0.76 (-2.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.64M
CCIZX vs NWHQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. NWHQX commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and NWHQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. NWHQX (157M). CCIZX (0.00) and NWHQX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than NWHQX: CCIZX (15 years) vs NWHQX (24 years). CCIZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NWHQX (0.88). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NWHQX (20.38). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWHQX: CCIZX (2000) vs NWHQX (5000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.66 vs. NWHQX (-12.76). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 56.34 vs. NWHQX (21.49).
| CCIZX | NWHQX | CCIZX / NWHQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.88 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.493 | -12.263 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 157M | 7,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.66 | -12.76 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.09 | 7.32 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.34 | 21.49 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.66 | 52.80 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...