Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs RCGTX
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs RCGTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$126.22
Change+$14.22 (+12.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.52B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$11.75
Change+$1.50 (+14.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. RCGTX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and RCGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. RCGTX (1.11B). CCIZX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs RCGTX (23 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RCGTX (23.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: CCIZX (2000) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.17 vs. CCIZX (-21.38). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 46.52 vs. RCGTX (-69.23).
| CCIZX | RCGTX | CCIZX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -24.472 | -25.182 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 1.11B | 946% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.38 | -12.17 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.79 | -47.30 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.52 | -69.23 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.41 | -79.50 | -97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...