Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs RCGTX
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs RCGTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$150.20
Change-$4.77 (-3.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.28B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$13.61
Change-$0.43 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. RCGTX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and RCGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. RCGTX (1.5B). CCIZX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: CCIZX (14 years) vs RCGTX (23 years). RCGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CCIZX (13.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: CCIZX (2000) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.86 vs. CCIZX (10.85). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 62.12 vs. RCGTX (-65.03).
| CCIZX | RCGTX | CCIZX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.288 | -0.657 | -196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.3B | 1.5B | 951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.85 | 18.86 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.27 | -32.19 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.12 | -65.03 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.40 | -72.67 | -189% |