Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs RCGTX
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs RCGTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$132.02
Change+$1.37 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.23B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$12.55
Change+$0.18 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. RCGTX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. RCGTX (1.33B). CCIZX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs RCGTX (23 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RCGTX (23.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: CCIZX (2000) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.47 vs. CCIZX (-7.43). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.61 vs. RCGTX (-68.25).
| CCIZX | RCGTX | CCIZX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.428 | -9.927 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 1.33B | 915% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.43 | 6.47 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.79 | -27.11 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.61 | -68.25 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.96 | -75.27 | -138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...