Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs RCGTX
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs RCGTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$164.40
Change-$0.19 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.21B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$15.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61B
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. RCGTX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. RCGTX (1.61B). CCIZX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RCGTX (23.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: CCIZX (2000) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.24 vs. CCIZX (20.51). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. RCGTX (-67.07).
| CCIZX | RCGTX | CCIZX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.992 | 15.036 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 1.61B | 946% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.51 | 42.24 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.95 | -10.30 | -368% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.20 | -67.07 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.84 | -68.60 | -234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement