Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs RCGTX
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs RCGTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$175.12
Change+$2.54 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$15.83
Change+$0.21 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
CCIZX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. RCGTX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and RCGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 15.7B vs. RCGTX (1.58B). CCIZX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RCGTX (23.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: CCIZX (2000) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.56 vs. CCIZX (15.84). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 65.37 vs. RCGTX (-69.49).
| CCIZX | RCGTX | CCIZX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.17 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.380 | 14.015 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.7B | 1.58B | 994% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.84 | 28.56 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.36 | -6.41 | -848% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.37 | -69.49 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.69 | -66.33 | -284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement