Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WFSTX
CCIZX vs WFSTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WFSTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$154.56
Change+$1.65 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.18B
Allspring Innovation Fund -
Price$12.64
Change+$0.18 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets431.05M
CCIZX vs WFSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WFSTX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and WFSTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 14.2B vs. WFSTX (431M). CCIZX (0.00) and WFSTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WFSTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WFSTX (25 years). WFSTX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. WFSTX (35.00). WFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WFSTX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). WFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. CCIZX (0.59). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. WFSTX (-25.34).
| CCIZX | WFSTX | CCIZX / WFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.22 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.30 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.116 | 6.861 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 431M | 3,295% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.59 | 7.69 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.41 | 15.37 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.19 | -25.34 | -249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.03 | 12.86 | 1,050% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers