Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs WFSTX
CCIZX vs WFSTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WFSTX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$121.56
Change-$10.01 (-7.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.4B
Allspring Innovation Fund -
Price$10.64
Change-$0.56 (-5.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets394.32M
CCIZX vs WFSTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WFSTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Hold and WFSTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. WFSTX (394M). CCIZX (0.00) and WFSTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WFSTX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WFSTX (25 years). WFSTX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). WFSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. CCIZX (39.00). WFSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WFSTX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). WFSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. CCIZX (-7.73). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 91.75 vs. WFSTX (-3.28).
| CCIZX | WFSTX | CCIZX / WFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.22 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.30 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.071 | -3.945 | 306% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 394M | 3,147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.73 | -1.75 | 440% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.23 | -24.53 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.75 | -3.28 | -2,796% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.74 | 3.70 | 3,017% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...