Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WFTCX
CCIZX vs WFTCX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WFTCX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$195.81
Change-$3.15 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.19B
Allspring Innovation Fund -
Price$4.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.95M
CCIZX vs WFTCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WFTCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Hold and WFTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 18.2B vs. WFTCX (388M). CCIZX (0.00) and WFTCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WFTCX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WFTCX (25 years). WFTCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.91). WFTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CCIZX (33.00). WFTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WFTCX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.55 vs. WFTCX (-17.15). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 70.91 vs. WFTCX (-65.95).
| CCIZX | WFTCX | CCIZX / WFTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.97 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.045 | 1.455 | 2,202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | 388M | 4,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.55 | -17.15 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.34 | -21.79 | -373% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.91 | -65.95 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.86 | -49.85 | -399% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers