Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs WFTCX
CCIZX vs WFTCX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WFTCX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$125.74
Change+$4.44 (+3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.36B
Allspring Innovation Fund -
Price$4.62
Change+$0.15 (+3.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets381.51M
CCIZX vs WFTCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WFTCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and WFTCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. WFTCX (382M). CCIZX (0.00) and WFTCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WFTCX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WFTCX (25 years). WFTCX (2.05) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). WFTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. CCIZX (39.00). WFTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WFTCX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.23 vs. WFTCX (-10.78). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 53.41 vs. WFTCX (-54.67).
| CCIZX | WFTCX | CCIZX / WFTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.97 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.05 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.201 | -7.069 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 382M | 2,984% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.23 | -10.78 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.62 | -41.64 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.41 | -54.67 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.82 | -53.73 | -173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...