Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WFTDX
CCIZX vs WFTDX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WFTDX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$138.98
Change+$0.33 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.2B
Allspring Innovation Fund - Class Admin
Price$12.73
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets429.3M
CCIZX vs WFTDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WFTDX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and WFTDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. WFTDX (429M). CCIZX (0.00) and WFTDX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WFTDX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WFTDX (15 years). WFTDX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). WFTDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. CCIZX (39.00). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFTDX: CCIZX (2000) vs WFTDX (1000000). WFTDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. CCIZX (-3.95). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 64.55 vs. WFTDX (-16.60).
| CCIZX | WFTDX | CCIZX / WFTDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.714 | 5.515 | -85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 429M | 3,077% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | 6.90 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.32 | 11.39 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.55 | -16.60 | -389% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.71 | 14.52 | 790% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers