Ad is loading...
CCIZX vs WSTAX
CCIZX vs WSTAX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WSTAX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$127.47
Change+$1.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.94B
Macquarie Science and Technology A
Price$47.34
Change+$0.57 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.07B
CCIZX vs WSTAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WSTAX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and WSTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. WSTAX (5.07B). CCIZX (0.00) and WSTAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WSTAX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WSTAX (25 years). WSTAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. WSTAX (29.00). WSTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WSTAX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). WSTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.29 vs. CCIZX (-5.79). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 61.21 vs. WSTAX (-27.82).
| CCIZX | WSTAX | CCIZX / WSTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.040 | -7.611 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 5.07B | 235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.79 | -4.29 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.12 | -13.75 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.21 | -27.82 | -220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.14 | -16.80 | -608% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...