Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs WSTAX
CCIZX vs WSTAX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs WSTAX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$148.32
Change+$0.78 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.71B
Macquarie Science and Technology A
Price$55.97
Change+$0.05 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.87B
CCIZX vs WSTAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. WSTAX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and WSTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 13.7B vs. WSTAX (5.87B). CCIZX (0.00) and WSTAX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than WSTAX: CCIZX (15 years) vs WSTAX (25 years). WSTAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. WSTAX (29.00). WSTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCIZX: WSTAX (1000) vs CCIZX (2000). WSTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.14 vs. CCIZX (-3.11). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 65.44 vs. WSTAX (-22.71).
| CCIZX | WSTAX | CCIZX / WSTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.16 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.506 | 9.133 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 5.87B | 234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.11 | -2.14 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.23 | 16.26 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.44 | -22.71 | -288% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.47 | -1.64 | -7,425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers