Ad is loading...
CCJTX vs RBEMX
CCJTX vs RBEMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCJTX vs. RBEMX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCJTX is a Hold and RBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCJTX (24.2B) and RBEMX (24.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RBEMX pays higher dividends than CCJTX: RBEMX (0.50) vs CCJTX (0.22). CCJTX was incepted earlier than RBEMX: CCJTX (11 years) vs RBEMX (11 years). CCJTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RBEMX (1.19). CCJTX (5.00) and RBEMX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCJTX (250) and RBEMX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.23 vs. CCJTX (4.94). RBEMX (41.16) and CCJTX (39.59) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCJTX | RBEMX | CCJTX / RBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.19 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.19 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.376 | -1.291 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 24.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.50 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | 5.23 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.34 | 17.19 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.59 | 41.16 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.24 | 57.26 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...