Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs FBKTX
CCKTX vs FBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. FBKTX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and FBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX (17.3B) and FBKTX (17.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBKTX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: FBKTX (0.98) vs CCKTX (0.15). CCKTX was incepted earlier than FBKTX: CCKTX (10 years) vs FBKTX (10 years). CCKTX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FBKTX (0.48). CCKTX (5.00) and FBKTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCKTX (250) and FBKTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.50 vs. CCKTX (13.39). FBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.18 vs. CCKTX (41.76).
| CCKTX | FBKTX | CCKTX / FBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.48 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.48 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.268 | 13.926 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.3B | 17.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.98 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.39 | 14.50 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.96 | 41.27 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.76 | 47.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.95 | 127.35 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers