Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs MFJBX
CCKTX vs MFJBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. MFJBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and MFJBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFJBX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: MFJBX (1.72) vs CCKTX (0.15). CCKTX was incepted earlier than MFJBX: CCKTX (10 years) vs MFJBX (9 years). MFJBX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CCKTX (1.47). MFJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. CCKTX (5.00). CCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJBX: CCKTX (250) vs MFJBX (1000). CCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. MFJBX (11.92). MFJBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. CCKTX (45.16).
| CCKTX | MFJBX | CCKTX / MFJBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.58 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.93 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.312 | 13.827 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.72 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 11.92 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.48 | 40.99 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.16 | 52.02 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement