Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs MFJBX
CCKTX vs MFJBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. MFJBX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and MFJBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX has more cash in the bank: 18B vs. MFJBX (251M). MFJBX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: MFJBX (1.69) vs CCKTX (0.15). CCKTX was incepted earlier than MFJBX: CCKTX (11 years) vs MFJBX (9 years). MFJBX (1.91) is less costly to investors than CCKTX (1.47). MFJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. CCKTX (5.00). CCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJBX: CCKTX (250) vs MFJBX (1000). CCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. MFJBX (6.92). MFJBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.90 vs. CCKTX (33.63).
| CCKTX | MFJBX | CCKTX / MFJBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.57 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.785 | 10.556 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18B | 251M | 7,171% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.69 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.92 | 6.92 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.66 | 33.56 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.63 | 38.90 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement