Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs MFJCX
CCKTX vs MFJCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. MFJCX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and MFJCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX has more cash in the bank: 18B vs. MFJCX (251M). MFJCX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: MFJCX (1.34) vs CCKTX (0.15). CCKTX was incepted earlier than MFJCX: CCKTX (11 years) vs MFJCX (9 years). MFJCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than CCKTX (1.47). MFJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. CCKTX (5.00). CCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJCX: CCKTX (250) vs MFJCX (1000). CCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. MFJCX (6.09). MFJCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.02 vs. CCKTX (33.63).
| CCKTX | MFJCX | CCKTX / MFJCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.57 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.785 | 9.825 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18B | 251M | 7,171% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.34 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.92 | 6.09 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.66 | 31.83 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.63 | 37.02 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement