Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCKTX vs MFJCX
CCKTX vs MFJCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. MFJCX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and MFJCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX has more cash in the bank: 18.2B vs. MFJCX (257M). MFJCX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: MFJCX (1.34) vs CCKTX (0.15). CCKTX was incepted earlier than MFJCX: CCKTX (11 years) vs MFJCX (9 years). MFJCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than CCKTX (1.47). MFJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. CCKTX (5.00). CCKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJCX: CCKTX (250) vs MFJCX (1000). CCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.61 vs. MFJCX (9.86). MFJCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.02 vs. CCKTX (43.57).
| CCKTX | MFJCX | CCKTX / MFJCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.57 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.576 | 13.392 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | 257M | 7,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.34 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.61 | 9.86 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.41 | 44.65 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.57 | 47.02 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement