Ad is loading...
CCKTX vs RBENX
CCKTX vs RBENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCKTX vs. RBENX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCKTX is a Hold and RBENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCKTX (15B) and RBENX (15B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RBENX pays higher dividends than CCKTX: RBENX (0.46) vs CCKTX (0.18). CCKTX was incepted earlier than RBENX: CCKTX (10 years) vs RBENX (10 years). CCKTX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RBENX (1.18). CCKTX (5.00) and RBENX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCKTX (250) and RBENX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RBENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.14 vs. CCKTX (4.83). RBENX (42.06) and CCKTX (40.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCKTX | RBENX | CCKTX / RBENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.895 | -1.823 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15B | 15B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.46 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | 5.14 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.81 | 17.78 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.43 | 42.06 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.83 | 70.75 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers