It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CCL (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +1.88% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.09%.
CCL is expected to report earnings on Sep 26, 2025.
Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
CCL | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCL | ICVT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago77% | 15 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago79% | 12 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago74% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
AFK | 22.42 | 0.16 | +0.71% |
VanEck Africa ETF | |||
IYE | 48.03 | 0.23 | +0.48% |
iShares US Energy ETF | |||
IBRN | 24.96 | N/A | N/A |
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF | |||
RFV | 129.36 | -0.10 | -0.08% |
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | |||
XPAY | 54.50 | -0.42 | -0.77% |
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICVT has been loosely correlated with W. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICVT jumps, then W could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT | 100% | -0.07% | ||
W - ICVT | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
TDOC - ICVT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
CCL - ICVT | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
Z - ICVT | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
VRNT - ICVT | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More |