CCL vs RGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCL is a Sell and RGS is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CCL (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while RGS (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -8.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCL is expected to report earnings on Dec 19, 2024.
RGS is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (-2.16% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| CCL | RGS | CCL / RGS | |
| Capitalization | 21.4B | 17.1M | 125,146% |
| EBITDA | 4.81B | 22.2M | 21,662% |
| Gain YTD | 31.122 | 83.704 | 37% |
| P/E Ratio | 50.81 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 22.6B | 216M | 10,463% |
| Total Cash | 2.24B | 7.15M | 31,343% |
| Total Debt | 32B | 525M | 6,095% |
CCL | RGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCL's Valuation (73) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (80) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.
CCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.
RGS's SMR Rating (7) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCL (47) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCL’s over the last 12 months.
CCL's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (40) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.
RGS's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CCL (97) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to CCL’s over the last 12 months.
| CCL | RGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 90% |
CCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCL has been closely correlated with NCLH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCL jumps, then NCLH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCL | 100% | N/A | ||
| NCLH - CCL | 83% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| RCL - CCL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| LIND - CCL | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TNL - CCL | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| BKNG - CCL | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||
RGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and CSV have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and CSV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGS | 100% | -3.56% | ||
| CSV - RGS | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| LIND - RGS | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MED - RGS | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| CCL - RGS | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MOND - RGS | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.77% | ||
More | ||||