CCLDP vs QTWO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCLDP is a StrongBuy and QTWO is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCLDP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCLDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCLDP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCLDP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
- QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCLDP (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -13.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -7.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
QTWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-7.78% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CCLDP | QTWO | CCLDP / QTWO | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 3.11B | - |
| EBITDA | -30.8M | 15.6M | -197% |
| Gain YTD | 0.101 | -31.277 | -0% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 117M | 625M | 19% |
| Total Cash | 3.33M | 324M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 14.7M | 549M | 3% |
CCLDP | QTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCLDP's Valuation (6) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (48). This means that CCLDP’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
QTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CCLDP (100). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to CCLDP’s over the last 12 months.
QTWO's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CCLDP (100). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to CCLDP’s over the last 12 months.
CCLDP's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (61). This means that CCLDP’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
CCLDP's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (100). This means that CCLDP’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.
| CCLDP | QTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 39% | 7 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 90% |
CCLDP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCLDP has been loosely correlated with MDRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCLDP jumps, then MDRX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCLDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCLDP | 100% | N/A | ||
| MDRX - CCLDP | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| ORCL - CCLDP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| CCLDO - CCLDP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| QTWO - CCLDP | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
| SYT - CCLDP | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
More | ||||
QTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTWO | 100% | -1.62% | ||
| ACIW - QTWO | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| ALKT - QTWO | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| COIN - QTWO | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| LYFT - QTWO | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| APP - QTWO | 53% Loosely correlated | +5.86% | ||
More | ||||