COIN
Price
$165.49
Change
+$16.43 (+11.02%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
43.6B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTWO
Price
$52.63
Change
+$2.43 (+4.84%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COIN vs QTWO

COIN vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COIN vs. QTWO commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COIN is a Hold and QTWO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2026
Stock price -- (COIN: $149.06 vs. QTWO: $52.63)
Brand notoriety: COIN and QTWO are both not notable
COIN represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while QTWO is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COIN: 111% vs. QTWO: 132%
Market capitalization -- COIN: $43.6B vs. QTWO: $3.29B
COIN [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $43.6B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $130.21B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $37.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COIN is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the short-term than COIN.

Price Growth

COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +4.59% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +19.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +6.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

COIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+6.75% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Packaged Software (+5.46% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COIN($43.6B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.3B). COIN has higher P/E ratio than QTWO: COIN (60.60) vs QTWO (37.25). QTWO YTD gains are higher at: -27.065 vs. COIN (-34.085). COIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.29B vs. QTWO (136M). COIN has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. QTWO (379M). QTWO has less debt than COIN: QTWO (344M) vs COIN (7.96B). COIN has higher revenues than QTWO: COIN (6.56B) vs QTWO (822M).
COINQTWOCOIN / QTWO
Capitalization43.6B3.3B1,323%
EBITDA1.29B136M945%
Gain YTD-34.085-27.065126%
P/E Ratio60.6037.25163%
Revenue6.56B822M798%
Total Cash10.7B379M2,823%
Total Debt7.96B344M2,315%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COINQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FANG179.91N/A
N/A
Diamondback Energy
ESQ118.47N/A
N/A
Esquire Financial Holdings
TWLVU10.25N/A
N/A
Twelve Seas Investment Company III
OPEN4.37N/A
N/A
Opendoor Technologies
TGHL0.51N/A
N/A
The Growhub Ltd

COIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COIN has been closely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COIN jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COIN
1D Price
Change %
COIN100%
N/A
AFRM - COIN
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
MSTR - COIN
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
RIOT - COIN
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
U - COIN
74%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
HOOD - COIN
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+4.84%
PCOR - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
+4.34%
ALKT - QTWO
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
FRSH - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MANH - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More