Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCLTX vs FBMTX
CCLTX vs FBMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCLTX vs. FBMTX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCLTX is a Hold and FBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCLTX (5.69B) and FBMTX (5.69B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBMTX pays higher dividends than CCLTX: FBMTX (0.89) vs CCLTX (0.21). CCLTX was incepted earlier than FBMTX: CCLTX (6 years) vs FBMTX (6 years). CCLTX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FBMTX (0.48). CCLTX (4.00) and FBMTX (4.00) have comparable annual turnover. CCLTX (250) and FBMTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.92 vs. CCLTX (12.75). FBMTX return over 5 years is better than : 59.00 vs. CCLTX (52.19).
| CCLTX | FBMTX | CCLTX / FBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.48 | 308% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.48 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.414 | 17.344 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.69B | 5.69B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.89 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.75 | 13.92 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.16 | 63.95 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.19 | 59.00 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers