It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCA’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
CCM (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -6.58% price change this week, while HCA (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.91%.
CCM is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.
HCA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
CCM | HCA | CCM / HCA | |
Capitalization | 24M | 88.2B | 0% |
EBITDA | -665.39M | 12.7B | -5% |
Gain YTD | -2.416 | 25.821 | -9% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 17.40 | - |
Revenue | 612M | 65B | 1% |
Total Cash | 243M | 935M | 26% |
Total Debt | 3.26B | 41.9B | 8% |
CCM | HCA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 25 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 6 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCA's Valuation (4) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as CCM (36). This means that HCA’s stock grew similarly to CCM’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCM (100). This means that HCA’s stock grew significantly faster than CCM’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's SMR Rating (42) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCM (100). This means that HCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCM’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCM (62). This means that HCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCM’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as CCM (64). This means that HCA’s stock grew similarly to CCM’s over the last 12 months.
CCM | HCA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 4 days ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 4 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago47% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 4 days ago55% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NUGT | 75.08 | 1.59 | +2.16% |
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X ETF | |||
NNOV | 27.48 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Nov | |||
BSEP | 45.51 | -0.04 | -0.09% |
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF-Sep | |||
DBEF | 44.05 | -0.33 | -0.74% |
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | |||
ROSC | 42.57 | -0.49 | -1.15% |
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCM and CYH have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCM and CYH's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCA has been closely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HCA | 100% | -0.59% | ||
THC - HCA | 72% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
UHS - HCA | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
ENSG - HCA | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
CYH - HCA | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
SGRY - HCA | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More |