CCNEP
Price
$24.24
Change
-$0.36 (-1.46%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
FSFG
Price
$25.90
Change
+$0.19 (+0.74%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
115.29M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCNEP vs FSFG

Header iconCCNEP vs FSFG Comparison
Open Charts CCNEP vs FSFGBanner chart's image
CNB Financial
Price$24.24
Change-$0.36 (-1.46%)
Volume$2.2K
CapitalizationN/A
First Savings Financial Group
Price$25.90
Change+$0.19 (+0.74%)
Volume$13.45K
Capitalization115.29M
CCNEP vs FSFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCNEP vs. FSFG commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCNEP is a Hold and FSFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CCNEP: $24.24 vs. FSFG: $25.90)
Brand notoriety: CCNEP and FSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCNEP: 63% vs. FSFG: 61%
Market capitalization -- CCNEP: $0 vs. FSFG: $115.29M
CCNEP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. FSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $115.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCNEP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCNEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the long-term than CCNEP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CCNEP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.73% price change this week, while FSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCNEP YTD gains are higher at: 0.598 vs. FSFG (-1.859). CCNEP has more cash in the bank: 61.5M vs. FSFG (17.5M). CCNEP has less debt than FSFG: CCNEP (143M) vs FSFG (405M). CCNEP has higher revenues than FSFG: CCNEP (218M) vs FSFG (82.3M).
CCNEPFSFGCCNEP / FSFG
CapitalizationN/A115M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.598-1.859-32%
P/E RatioN/A18.62-
Revenue218M82.3M265%
Total Cash61.5M17.5M351%
Total Debt143M405M35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRIFX4.500.05
+1.12%
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income A
PURYX54.310.55
+1.02%
Putnam Research Y
ADGCX15.610.14
+0.90%
AB Core Opportunities C
TRERX16.010.07
+0.44%
Nuveen International Eq Retire
TEMLX8.640.03
+0.35%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq R6

CCNEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCNEP and FHN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCNEP and FHN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCNEP
1D Price
Change %
CCNEP100%
-1.46%
FHN - CCNEP
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
FSFG - CCNEP
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
AFBI - CCNEP
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
WAL - CCNEP
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
PWOD - CCNEP
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
More

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
+0.74%
SHBI - FSFG
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
TCBI - FSFG
41%
Loosely correlated
+5.08%
AUB - FSFG
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
FBK - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
WNEB - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
More