CCOEF
Price
$27.70
Change
-$0.80 (-2.81%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
11.37B
GBTG
Price
$8.30
Change
+$0.05 (+0.61%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.95B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCOEF vs GBTG

Header iconCCOEF vs GBTG Comparison
Open Charts CCOEF vs GBTGBanner chart's image
Capcom
Price$27.70
Change-$0.80 (-2.81%)
Volume$140
Capitalization11.37B
Global Business Travel Group
Price$8.30
Change+$0.05 (+0.61%)
Volume$119
Capitalization3.95B
CCOEF vs GBTG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBTG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCOEF vs. GBTG commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCOEF is a Hold and GBTG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CCOEF: $27.70 vs. GBTG: $8.25)
Brand notoriety: CCOEF and GBTG are both not notable
CCOEF represents the Electronics/Appliances, while GBTG is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCOEF: 51% vs. GBTG: 63%
Market capitalization -- CCOEF: $11.27B vs. GBTG: $3.95B
CCOEF [@Electronics/Appliances] is valued at $11.27B. GBTG’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $3.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $183.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.57B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCOEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGBTG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GBTG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCOEF is a better buy in the long-term than GBTG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCOEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBTG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCOEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GBTG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCOEF is a better buy in the short-term than GBTG.

Price Growth

CCOEF (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GBTG (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

GBTG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics/Appliances (+0.94% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

@Consumer Sundries (+0.66% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOEF($11.4B) has a higher market cap than GBTG($3.95B). CCOEF YTD gains are higher at: 26.484 vs. GBTG (-11.099). CCOEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 48.5B vs. GBTG (313M). CCOEF has more cash in the bank: 126B vs. GBTG (601M). GBTG has less debt than CCOEF: GBTG (1.45B) vs CCOEF (6.97B). CCOEF has higher revenues than GBTG: CCOEF (134B) vs GBTG (2.44B).
CCOEFGBTGCCOEF / GBTG
Capitalization11.4B3.95B288%
EBITDA48.5B313M15,495%
Gain YTD26.484-11.099-239%
P/E Ratio35.23N/A-
Revenue134B2.44B5,492%
Total Cash126B601M20,965%
Total Debt6.97B1.45B479%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCOEF: Fundamental Ratings
CCOEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCOEFGBTG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBTG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSLNX20.600.03
+0.15%
Janus Henderson Global Select N
FAGOX201.10N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps M
NCVLX12.58N/A
N/A
Nuance Concentrated Value Institutional
MOSZX9.79N/A
N/A
MassMutual Overseas I
FIQEX76.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Canada Z

CCOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOEF and ASFT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOEF and ASFT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOEF
1D Price
Change %
CCOEF100%
N/A
ASFT - CCOEF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADSK - CCOEF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
RXT - CCOEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
GBTG - CCOEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
ONEI - CCOEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.12%
More

GBTG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBTG has been loosely correlated with RCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBTG jumps, then RCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBTG
1D Price
Change %
GBTG100%
+0.12%
RCL - GBTG
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
CUK - GBTG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
CCL - GBTG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
TNL - GBTG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
EXPE - GBTG
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
More