CCOEF
Price
$24.32
Change
+$3.23 (+15.31%)
Updated
Feb 11 closing price
Capitalization
9.51B
RXT
Price
$2.90
Change
+$0.02 (+0.69%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
339.52M
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CCOEF vs RXT

Header iconCCOEF vs RXT Comparison
Open Charts CCOEF vs RXTBanner chart's image
Capcom
Price$24.32
Change+$3.23 (+15.31%)
Volume$500
Capitalization9.51B
Rackspace Technology
Price$2.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.69%)
Volume$2.09M
Capitalization339.52M
CCOEF vs RXT Comparison Chart
Loading...
RXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCOEF vs. RXT commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCOEF is a Hold and RXT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CCOEF: $24.33 vs. RXT: $2.90)
Brand notoriety: CCOEF and RXT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCOEF: 115% vs. RXT: 254%
Market capitalization -- CCOEF: $9.51B vs. RXT: $339.52M
CCOEF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $9.51B. RXT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $339.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCOEF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRXT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCOEF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RXT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCOEF is a better buy in the long-term than RXT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RXT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RXT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CCOEF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RXT (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

RXT is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOEF($9.51B) has a higher market cap than RXT($340M). RXT YTD gains are higher at: 31.222 vs. CCOEF (11.073). CCOEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 67.8B vs. RXT (-189.9M). CCOEF has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. RXT (197M). RXT has less debt than CCOEF: RXT (3.43B) vs CCOEF (7.84B). CCOEF has higher revenues than RXT: CCOEF (145B) vs RXT (2.96B).
CCOEFRXTCCOEF / RXT
Capitalization9.51B340M2,796%
EBITDA67.8B-189.9M-35,703%
Gain YTD11.07331.22235%
P/E Ratio27.25N/A-
Revenue145B2.96B4,904%
Total Cash109B197M55,330%
Total Debt7.84B3.43B228%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCOEF: Fundamental Ratings
CCOEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RXT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBICX9.91-0.01
-0.10%
DWS Global Macro C
FIVLX10.94-0.09
-0.82%
Fidelity International Value
HLRRX10.52-0.14
-1.31%
LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Instl
AFVLX22.22-0.35
-1.55%
Applied Finance Select Investor
PNOCX86.15-1.57
-1.79%
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C

CCOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOEF and ASFT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOEF and ASFT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOEF
1D Price
Change %
CCOEF100%
N/A
ASFT - CCOEF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADSK - CCOEF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
RXT - CCOEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
GBTG - CCOEF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
ONEI - CCOEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-10.44%
More

RXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RXT has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RXT jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RXT
1D Price
Change %
RXT100%
+0.69%
COIN - RXT
50%
Loosely correlated
-8.27%
CLSK - RXT
44%
Loosely correlated
-8.05%
RIOT - RXT
43%
Loosely correlated
-9.83%
CORZ - RXT
36%
Loosely correlated
-8.78%
ANSS - RXT
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
More