CCOJF
Price
$12.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
CELH
Price
$31.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CCOJF vs CELH

Header iconCCOJF vs CELH Comparison
Open Charts CCOJF vs CELHBanner chart's image
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan
Price$12.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Celsius Holdings
Price$31.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.76M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CCOJF vs CELH Comparison Chart
Loading...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CCOJF vs. CELH commentary
Nov 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCOJF is a Hold and CELH is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 06, 2024
Stock price -- (CCOJF: $12.88 vs. CELH: $31.07)
Brand notoriety: CCOJF and CELH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCOJF: 100% vs. CELH: 65%
Market capitalization -- CCOJF: $2.09B vs. CELH: $19.3B
CCOJF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $2.09B. CELH’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $19.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCOJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCELH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCOJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the long-term than CCOJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CELH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CCOJF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.28% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CELH($19.3B) has a higher market cap than CCOJF($2.09B). CCOJF YTD gains are higher at: 9.153 vs. CELH (-43.012). CCOJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.2B vs. CELH (270M). CCOJF has more cash in the bank: 77.9B vs. CELH (756M). CELH has less debt than CCOJF: CELH (2.19M) vs CCOJF (178B). CCOJF has higher revenues than CELH: CCOJF (821B) vs CELH (1.32B).
CCOJFCELHCCOJF / CELH
Capitalization2.09B19.3B11%
EBITDA35.2B270M13,037%
Gain YTD9.153-43.012-21%
P/E RatioN/A107.25-
Revenue821B1.32B62,291%
Total Cash77.9B756M10,304%
Total Debt178B2.19M8,139,003%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCOJF vs CELH: Fundamental Ratings
CCOJF
CELH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3960
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
8514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5565
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9799
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCOJF's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (91) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCOJF’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOJF (100) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's SMR Rating (14) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCOJF (85) in the null industry. This means that CELH’s stock grew significantly faster than CCOJF’s over the last 12 months.

CCOJF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (65) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCOJF’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CCOJF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CELH (99) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCOJF’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEMJX36.660.21
+0.58%
MFS Emerging Markets Equity R6
HRSGX12.510.06
+0.48%
Harbor Small Cap Growth Admin
RYGRX79.520.02
+0.03%
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth C
MNOZX33.69N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
FSEBX12.95-0.02
-0.15%
Fidelity Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund

CCOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOJF and CCHGY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOJF and CCHGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOJF
1D Price
Change %
CCOJF100%
N/A
CCHGY - CCOJF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
BRFH - CCOJF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
CELH - CCOJF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
KDP - CCOJF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
CHFHY - CCOJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
-1.30%
MNST - CELH
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
COCO - CELH
27%
Poorly correlated
+8.35%
KOF - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
COKE - CELH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
PRMW - CELH
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
More