CCORF
Price
$7.12
Change
-$0.54 (-7.05%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
623.61M
NRSCF
Price
$6.30
Change
-$0.41 (-6.11%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
12.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCORF vs NRSCF

Header iconCCORF vs NRSCF Comparison
Open Charts CCORF vs NRSCFBanner chart's image
Canaccord Genuity Group
Price$7.12
Change-$0.54 (-7.05%)
Volume$265
Capitalization623.61M
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.30
Change-$0.41 (-6.11%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization12.83B
CCORF vs NRSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCORF vs. NRSCF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCORF is a Hold and NRSCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CCORF: $7.12 vs. NRSCF: $6.30)
Brand notoriety: CCORF and NRSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCORF: 2% vs. NRSCF: 16%
Market capitalization -- CCORF: $623.61M vs. NRSCF: $12.83B
CCORF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $623.61M. NRSCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCORF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCORF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRSCF is a better buy in the long-term than CCORF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCORF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRSCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCORF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NRSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCORF is a better buy in the short-term than NRSCF.

Price Growth

CCORF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -9.76% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -6.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.99% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRSCF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than CCORF($624M). NRSCF has higher P/E ratio than CCORF: NRSCF (18.52) vs CCORF (10.94). NRSCF YTD gains are higher at: 9.680 vs. CCORF (1.352). CCORF has less debt than NRSCF: CCORF (434M) vs NRSCF (11.4T). NRSCF has higher revenues than CCORF: NRSCF (1.12T) vs CCORF (1.51B).
CCORFNRSCFCCORF / NRSCF
Capitalization624M12.8B5%
EBITDA88.1MN/A-
Gain YTD1.3529.68014%
P/E Ratio10.9418.5259%
Revenue1.51B1.12T0%
Total Cash1.72BN/A-
Total Debt434M11.4T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCORF vs NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
CCORF
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8598
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8258
SMR RATING
1..100
921
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5885
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRSCF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (26). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CCORF (82). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCORF (92). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CCORF’s over the last 12 months.

CCORF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as NRSCF (51). This means that CCORF’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

CCORF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as NRSCF (85). This means that CCORF’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCORFNRSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCORF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEKX32.420.11
+0.35%
SPDR Galaxy TransformativeTechAcclrtrETF
MMU9.920.02
+0.20%
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund
SIHY45.810.05
+0.11%
Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF
LKOR42.54N/A
N/A
FlexShares Crdt-Scrd US Lng Corp Bd ETF
SSO101.61-0.14
-0.14%
ProShares Ultra S&P500

CCORF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCORF has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCORF jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCORF
1D Price
Change %
CCORF100%
-7.05%
CLSK - CCORF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
MQBKY - CCORF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
HUT - CCORF
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.24%
WULF - CCORF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.69%
CIFR - CCORF
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
More

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and NMR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
N/A
NMR - NRSCF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
CCORF - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.05%
MQBKY - NRSCF
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
MCQEF - NRSCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - NRSCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+8.01%
More