CCRDF
Price
$7.41
Change
+$0.66 (+9.78%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
8.62B
CHBAF
Price
$8.01
Change
-$0.49 (-5.76%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCRDF vs CHBAF

Header iconCCRDF vs CHBAF Comparison
Open Charts CCRDF vs CHBAFBanner chart's image
Concordia Financial Group
Price$7.41
Change+$0.66 (+9.78%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization8.62B
Chiba Bank, Ltd. (The)
Price$8.01
Change-$0.49 (-5.76%)
Volume$112
Capitalization7.27B
CCRDF vs CHBAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHBAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCRDF vs. CHBAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCRDF is a Buy and CHBAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CCRDF: $7.41 vs. CHBAF: $8.01)
Brand notoriety: CCRDF and CHBAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCRDF: 126% vs. CHBAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CCRDF: $8.62B vs. CHBAF: $7.27B
CCRDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.62B. CHBAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCRDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCHBAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CHBAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCRDF is a better buy in the long-term than CHBAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCRDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHBAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCRDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CHBAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHBAF is a better buy in the short-term than CCRDF.

Price Growth

CCRDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CHBAF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCRDF($8.62B) has a higher market cap than CHBAF($7.27B). CCRDF has higher P/E ratio than CHBAF: CCRDF (15.31) vs CHBAF (13.52). CCRDF YTD gains are higher at: 26.992 vs. CHBAF (0.000). CCRDF has less debt than CHBAF: CCRDF (2.26T) vs CHBAF (3.62T). CCRDF has higher revenues than CHBAF: CCRDF (314B) vs CHBAF (257B).
CCRDFCHBAFCCRDF / CHBAF
Capitalization8.62B7.27B119%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.9920.000-
P/E Ratio15.3113.52113%
Revenue314B257B122%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.26T3.62T63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCRDF vs CHBAF: Fundamental Ratings
CCRDF
CHBAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4640
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
841
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4273
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2739
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCRDF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBAF (58). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHBAF (41). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBAF (1). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBAF (73). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as CHBAF (39). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to CHBAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCRDFCHBAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHBAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRAZ25.010.47
+1.91%
Global X Brazil Active ETF
INKM33.280.13
+0.38%
SPDR® SSgA Income Allocation ETF
GMAY40.06-0.02
-0.05%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - May
ZDEK25.01-0.02
-0.10%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrDec
SPUS47.07-0.05
-0.11%
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and MZHOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and MZHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
N/A
MZHOF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
IITSF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More

CHBAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHBAF and BKHPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHBAF and BKHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHBAF
1D Price
Change %
CHBAF100%
N/A
BKHPF - CHBAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFSI - CHBAF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
DBSDF - CHBAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.54%
CCRDF - CHBAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLQC - CHBAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More