CCRDF
Price
$5.55
Change
+$0.05 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
IITSF
Price
$4.24
Change
+$0.05 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
48.81B
Ad is loading...

CCRDF vs IITSF

Header iconCCRDF vs IITSF Comparison
Open Charts CCRDF vs IITSFBanner chart's image
Concordia Financial Group
Price$5.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.91%)
Volume$3.6K
Capitalization5.59B
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A
Price$4.24
Change+$0.05 (+1.19%)
Volume$3.13K
Capitalization48.81B
CCRDF vs IITSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IITSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCRDF vs. IITSF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCRDF is a Hold and IITSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CCRDF: $5.55 vs. IITSF: $4.24)
Brand notoriety: CCRDF and IITSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCRDF: 151% vs. IITSF: 74%
Market capitalization -- CCRDF: $5.59B vs. IITSF: $48.81B
CCRDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.59B. IITSF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $48.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCRDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIITSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IITSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IITSF is a better buy in the long-term than CCRDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCRDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IITSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCRDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IITSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IITSF is a better buy in the short-term than CCRDF.

Price Growth

CCRDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.91% price change this week, while IITSF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IITSF($48.8B) has a higher market cap than CCRDF($5.59B). IITSF (13.04) and CCRDF (12.48) have similar P/E ratio . IITSF YTD gains are higher at: 6.787 vs. CCRDF (-4.884). CCRDF has higher revenues than IITSF: CCRDF (268B) vs IITSF (22.3B).
CCRDFIITSFCCRDF / IITSF
Capitalization5.59B48.8B11%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.8846.787-72%
P/E Ratio12.4813.0496%
Revenue268B22.3B1,202%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.28TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCRDF vs IITSF: Fundamental Ratings
CCRDF
IITSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6156
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCRDF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as IITSF (43). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to IITSF’s over the last 12 months.

IITSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCRDF (100). This means that IITSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as IITSF (3). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to IITSF’s over the last 12 months.

IITSF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRDF (52). This means that IITSF’s stock grew similarly to CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

IITSF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRDF (61). This means that IITSF’s stock grew similarly to CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCRDFIITSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
1%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IITSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIVL109.620.67
+0.61%
WisdomTree US Al Enhanced Val ETF
IVLU27.310.13
+0.48%
iShares Edge MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
AFSM30.750.13
+0.43%
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
RATE20.50N/A
N/A
Global X Interest Rate Hedge ETF
CDX22.27-0.07
-0.32%
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hdg ETF

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and MZHOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and MZHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
N/A
MZHOF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
IITSF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IITSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IITSF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IITSF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IITSF
1D Price
Change %
IITSF100%
N/A
ISNPY - IITSF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
TRST - IITSF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
CRARY - IITSF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
HONE - IITSF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
EBKDY - IITSF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More