CCRDF
Price
$6.21
Change
+$0.18 (+2.99%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
IITSF
Price
$5.83
Change
+$0.09 (+1.57%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
48.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCRDF vs IITSF

Header iconCCRDF vs IITSF Comparison
Open Charts CCRDF vs IITSFBanner chart's image
Concordia Financial Group
Price$6.21
Change+$0.18 (+2.99%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.59B
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A
Price$5.83
Change+$0.09 (+1.57%)
Volume$153
Capitalization48.81B
CCRDF vs IITSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IITSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCRDF vs. IITSF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCRDF is a Buy and IITSF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CCRDF: $6.21 vs. IITSF: $5.83)
Brand notoriety: CCRDF and IITSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCRDF: 69% vs. IITSF: 1%
Market capitalization -- CCRDF: $5.59B vs. IITSF: $48.81B
CCRDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.59B. IITSF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $48.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCRDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIITSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IITSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IITSF is a better buy in the long-term than CCRDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCRDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IITSF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCRDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • IITSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IITSF is a better buy in the short-term than CCRDF.

Price Growth

CCRDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IITSF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IITSF($48.8B) has a higher market cap than CCRDF($5.59B). IITSF (13.04) and CCRDF (12.48) have similar P/E ratio . IITSF YTD gains are higher at: 46.667 vs. CCRDF (6.346). CCRDF has higher revenues than IITSF: CCRDF (268B) vs IITSF (22.3B).
CCRDFIITSFCCRDF / IITSF
Capitalization5.59B48.8B11%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.34646.66714%
P/E Ratio12.4813.0496%
Revenue268B22.3B1,202%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.28TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCRDF vs IITSF: Fundamental Ratings
CCRDF
IITSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1816
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8436
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCRDF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IITSF (65). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IITSF’s over the last 12 months.

IITSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRDF (18). This means that IITSF’s stock grew similarly to CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as IITSF (3). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to IITSF’s over the last 12 months.

IITSF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRDF (54). This means that IITSF’s stock grew similarly to CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

IITSF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCRDF (84). This means that IITSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCRDFIITSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IITSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMRE7.270.30
+4.30%
Global Medical REIT
FWONA93.341.57
+1.71%
Liberty Media Corp
OI15.670.10
+0.64%
O-I Glass
DGLY2.300.01
+0.44%
Digital Ally Inc New
HNVR23.240.09
+0.39%
Hanover Bancorp

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and MZHOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and MZHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
N/A
MZHOF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
IITSF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IITSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IITSF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IITSF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IITSF
1D Price
Change %
IITSF100%
+1.57%
ISNPY - IITSF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
TRST - IITSF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
CRARY - IITSF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
HONE - IITSF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
EBKDY - IITSF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
More