Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSAX vs PCLAX
CCSAX vs PCLAX Comparison
Open Charts CCSAX vs PCLAX
Columbia Commodity Strategy A
Price$9.04
Change+$0.16 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets345.01M
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy A
Price$6.42
Change+$0.16 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.22B
CCSAX vs PCLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSAX vs. PCLAX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSAX is a Hold and PCLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLAX has more cash in the bank: 4.22B vs. CCSAX (345M). PCLAX (8.85) and CCSAX (8.83) have matching dividends . CCSAX was incepted earlier than PCLAX: CCSAX (13 years) vs PCLAX (15 years). PCLAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CCSAX (1.11). PCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 224.00 vs. CCSAX (117.00). CCSAX (6%) and PCLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PCLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSAX: PCLAX (1000) vs CCSAX (2000). CCSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. PCLAX (2.53). PCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 152.38 vs. CCSAX (98.09).
| CCSAX | PCLAX | CCSAX / PCLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.28 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.45 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.263 | 4.085 | 202% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 345M | 4.22B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.83 | 8.85 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 2.53 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.18 | -1.01 | 711% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.09 | 152.38 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.04 | 73.25 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement