Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMAQX
CCSGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMAQX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$25.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.22M
CCSGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. CCSGX (657M). PMAQX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMAQX (0.19) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CCSGX (10 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). PMAQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSGX (9.00). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMAQX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.96 vs. CCSGX (10.06). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 48.45 vs. CCSGX (40.12).
| CCSGX | PMAQX | CCSGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.59 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.714 | 3.025 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 30.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 11.96 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 35.66 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.12 | 48.45 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement