Ad is loading...
CCSGX vs PMAQX
CCSGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMAQX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$27.10
Change+$0.26 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets728.07M
CCSGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a StrongBuy and PMAQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 30.1B vs. CCSGX (728M). PMAQX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMAQX (0.10) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CCSGX (10 years) vs PMAQX (8 years). PMAQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.10 vs. CCSGX (9.00). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMAQX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.02 vs. CCSGX (15.54). CCSGX (47.15) and PMAQX (46.13) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCSGX | PMAQX | CCSGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.209 | 4.056 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 728M | 30.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.54 | 20.02 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.75 | 24.49 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 46.13 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 200.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...