Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMAQX
CCSGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMAQX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$26.05
Change+$0.26 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets651.12M
CCSGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 32.1B vs. CCSGX (651M). PMAQX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMAQX (0.19) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). PMAQX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMAQX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.27 vs. CCSGX (2.71). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 54.75 vs. CCSGX (39.71).
| CCSGX | PMAQX | CCSGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.59 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.59 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.790 | 5.736 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 651M | 32.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | 10.27 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.82 | 51.53 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.71 | 54.75 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement