Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMBJX
CCSGX vs PMBJX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBJX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$25.69
Change+$0.23 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.3M
CCSGX vs PMBJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBJX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and PMBJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. CCSGX (645M). PMBJX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBJX (0.06) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBJX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PMBJX (24 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). PMBJX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBJX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.70 vs. CCSGX (9.46). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 58.50 vs. CCSGX (46.74).
| CCSGX | PMBJX | CCSGX / PMBJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.78 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.78 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.046 | 3.480 | -88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 645M | 30.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 11.70 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 45.26 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.74 | 58.50 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.88 | 95.27 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement