Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMBJX
CCSGX vs PMBJX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBJX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$25.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.22M
CCSGX vs PMBJX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBJX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PMBJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. CCSGX (657M). PMBJX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBJX (0.06) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBJX: CCSGX (10 years) vs PMBJX (24 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). PMBJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSGX (9.00). PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBJX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. CCSGX (10.06). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 44.95 vs. CCSGX (40.12).
| CCSGX | PMBJX | CCSGX / PMBJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.78 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.78 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.714 | 2.940 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 30.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 11.47 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 33.87 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.12 | 44.95 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.68 | 91.79 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement