Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMBJX
CCSGX vs PMBJX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBJX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$26.14
Change-$0.15 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.64M
CCSGX vs PMBJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBJX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PMBJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 32.9B vs. CCSGX (646M). PMBJX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBJX (0.06) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBJX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PMBJX (25 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). PMBJX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBJX (1000) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.49 vs. CCSGX (2.58). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. CCSGX (33.32).
| CCSGX | PMBJX | CCSGX / PMBJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.78 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.78 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.114 | 7.449 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 646M | 32.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.58 | 7.49 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.25 | 43.86 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.32 | 43.15 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.41 | 114.27 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers