Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMBMX
CCSGX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBMX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$23.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets565.54M
CCSGX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and PMBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. CCSGX (566M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBMX (0.02) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). PMBMX (1.14) is less costly to investors than CCSGX (1.02). PMBMX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBMX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.81 vs. CCSGX (-13.33). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.41 vs. CCSGX (10.21).
| CCSGX | PMBMX | CCSGX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.14 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.14 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.596 | -0.906 | 1,059% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 566M | 30.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.33 | -6.81 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.18 | 30.95 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.21 | 23.41 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.28 | 83.62 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers