Ad is loading...
CCSGX vs PMBMX
CCSGX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBMX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$24.02
Change+$0.46 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.36M
CCSGX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBMX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PMBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. CCSGX (610M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBMX (0.02) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: CCSGX (10 years) vs PMBMX (24 years). PMBMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than CCSGX (1.02). PMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSGX (9.00). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBMX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.11 vs. CCSGX (-1.34). PMBMX (56.64) and CCSGX (56.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCSGX | PMBMX | CCSGX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.15 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.15 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | -6.267 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 27.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 1.11 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.99 | 14.53 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.23 | 56.64 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.42 | 67.17 | 216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers