Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMBMX
CCSGX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBMX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$25.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.22M
CCSGX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBMX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PMBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. CCSGX (657M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBMX (0.02) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: CCSGX (10 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). PMBMX (1.14) is less costly to investors than CCSGX (1.02). PMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSGX (9.00). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBMX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.05 vs. CCSGX (10.06). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 42.56 vs. CCSGX (40.12).
| CCSGX | PMBMX | CCSGX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.14 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.14 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.714 | 2.791 | -61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 30.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 11.05 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 32.49 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.12 | 42.56 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.68 | 86.33 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement