Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSGX vs PMBPX
CCSGX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBPX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$25.69
Change+$0.23 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.3M
CCSGX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Hold and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. CCSGX (645M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBPX (0.01) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: CCSGX (11 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). PMBPX (10.50) and CCSGX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBPX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.82 vs. CCSGX (9.46). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. CCSGX (46.74).
| CCSGX | PMBPX | CCSGX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.83 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.83 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.046 | 3.451 | -88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 645M | 30.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 11.82 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 45.75 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.74 | 59.73 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.88 | 99.17 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement