Ad is loading...
CCSGX vs PMBPX
CCSGX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts CCSGX vs PMBPX
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional
Price$24.02
Change+$0.46 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.36M
CCSGX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSGX vs. PMBPX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSGX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. CCSGX (610M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than CCSGX: PMBPX (0.01) vs CCSGX (0.00). CCSGX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: CCSGX (10 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). CCSGX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.84). PMBPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSGX (9.00). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSGX: PMBPX (0) vs CCSGX (250000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.60 vs. CCSGX (-1.34). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 60.59 vs. CCSGX (56.23).
| CCSGX | PMBPX | CCSGX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.84 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.84 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.282 | -6.190 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 27.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.34 | 1.60 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.99 | 16.16 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.23 | 60.59 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.42 | 75.51 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers