Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMAQX
CCSMX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMAQX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.03
Change-$0.07 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets656.74M
CCSMX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMAQX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Buy and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 31.1B vs. CCSMX (657M). PMAQX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMAQX (0.19) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CCSMX (11 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). PMAQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSMX (9.00). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMAQX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. CCSMX (8.42). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 58.61 vs. CCSMX (47.30).
| CCSMX | PMAQX | CCSMX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.59 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.59 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.953 | 3.204 | -61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 31.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 11.26 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.22 | 51.54 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.30 | 58.61 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers