Ad is loading...
CCSMX vs PMAQX
CCSMX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMAQX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$24.55
Change+$0.30 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets648.8M
CCSMX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMAQX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a StrongBuy and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. CCSMX (649M). PMAQX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMAQX (0.20) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CCSMX (11 years) vs PMAQX (8 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.60). PMAQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSMX (9.00). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMAQX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. CCSMX (3.32). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 104.66 vs. CCSMX (81.78).
| CCSMX | PMAQX | CCSMX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.60 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.60 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.273 | 0.157 | -3,362% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 649M | 29.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | 7.28 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.45 | 20.67 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.78 | 104.66 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 155.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...