Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMAQX
CCSMX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMAQX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.73
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets658.02M
CCSMX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMAQX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Buy and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. CCSMX (658M). PMAQX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMAQX (0.19) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CCSMX (12 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). PMAQX (10.50) and CCSMX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMAQX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.98 vs. CCSMX (5.88). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 58.81 vs. CCSMX (40.75).
| CCSMX | PMAQX | CCSMX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.59 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.59 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.508 | 8.761 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 33.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 13.98 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.18 | 50.84 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.75 | 58.81 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement