Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCSMX vs PMBMX
CCSMX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBMX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$25.73
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets658.02M
CCSMX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a Buy and PMBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. CCSMX (658M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMBMX (0.02) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: CCSMX (12 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). PMBMX (10.50) and CCSMX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBMX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.04 vs. CCSMX (5.88). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.44 vs. CCSMX (40.75).
| CCSMX | PMBMX | CCSMX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.14 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.14 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.508 | 8.421 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 33.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 13.04 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.18 | 47.27 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.75 | 52.44 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.56 | 97.42 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement