Ad is loading...
CCSMX vs PMBMX
CCSMX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts CCSMX vs PMBMX
Conestoga SMid Cap Investors
Price$23.40
Change-$1.15 (-4.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.6M
CCSMX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCSMX vs. PMBMX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCSMX is a StrongBuy and PMBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 29.8B vs. CCSMX (658M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than CCSMX: PMBMX (0.02) vs CCSMX (0.00). CCSMX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: CCSMX (11 years) vs PMBMX (24 years). CCSMX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.15). PMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. CCSMX (9.00). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCSMX: PMBMX (0) vs CCSMX (2500). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. CCSMX (4.47). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 98.31 vs. CCSMX (84.03).
| CCSMX | PMBMX | CCSMX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.15 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.15 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.102 | 0.955 | -430% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 29.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 6.95 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.63 | 17.92 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.03 | 98.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.07 | 80.21 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...