Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs RGAGX
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs RGAGX
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$9.78
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets686.3M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.42
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.41B
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. CCWRX (686M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CCWRX: RGAGX (0.60) vs CCWRX (0.00). CCWRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CCWRX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). CCWRX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: RGAGX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.57 vs. CCWRX (-4.88). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.25 vs. CCWRX (-37.78).
| CCWRX | RGAGX | CCWRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.30 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.30 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.106 | 14.581 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 686M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.88 | 17.57 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.77 | 43.78 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.78 | 46.25 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.51 | 89.61 | -55% |