CCYY
Price
$5.80
Change
+$0.05 (+0.87%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
CEFC
Price
$10.20
Change
-$0.10 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.88M
Ad is loading...

CCYY vs CEFC

Header iconCCYY vs CEFC Comparison
Open Charts CCYY vs CEFCBanner chart's image
CCCB BAN
Price$5.80
Change+$0.05 (+0.87%)
Volume$5.41K
CapitalizationN/A
Commercial National Financial Corp (MI)
Price$10.20
Change-$0.10 (-0.97%)
Volume$300
Capitalization25.88M
CCYY vs CEFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCYY vs. CEFC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCYY is a Hold and CEFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CCYY: $5.80 vs. CEFC: $10.20)
Brand notoriety: CCYY and CEFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCYY: 550% vs. CEFC: 21%
Market capitalization -- CCYY: $0 vs. CEFC: $25.88M
CCYY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. CEFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCYY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCEFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CEFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CEFC is a better buy in the long-term than CCYY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCYY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CEFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCYY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CEFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCYY is a better buy in the short-term than CEFC.

Price Growth

CCYY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.87% price change this week, while CEFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEFC YTD gains are higher at: 3.553 vs. CCYY (0.870).
CCYYCEFCCCYY / CEFC
CapitalizationN/A25.9M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.8703.55324%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A11.5M-
Total CashN/A6.29M-
Total DebtN/A39.8M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCYY vs CEFC: Fundamental Ratings
CCYY
CEFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
6641
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4338
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCYY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CEFC (28). This means that CCYY’s stock grew similarly to CEFC’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCYY (100). This means that CEFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CCYY (66). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CCYY (48). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CCYY (43). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCYYCEFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CCYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVGE74.060.56
+0.76%
Avantis All Equity Markets ETF
IMCG78.300.54
+0.69%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
XSVN46.270.01
+0.02%
BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF
EVNT10.81N/A
N/A
AltShares Event-Driven ETF
REIT27.31-0.04
-0.15%
ALPS Active REIT ETF

CCYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCYY and PCLB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCYY and PCLB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCYY
1D Price
Change %
CCYY100%
+0.87%
PCLB - CCYY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBN - CCYY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBKM - CCYY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCBC - CCYY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEFC - CCYY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
More

CEFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEFC and EQGPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEFC and EQGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEFC
1D Price
Change %
CEFC100%
-0.97%
EQGPF - CEFC
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.78%
MCBK - CEFC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPERF - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.27%
NDBKY - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
CNBN - CEFC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More