CDAB
Price
$16.79
Change
+$0.04 (+0.24%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
WFCL
Price
$5526.00
Change
+$1.00 (+0.02%)
Updated
Oct 29 closing price
Ad is loading...

CDAB vs WFCL

Header iconCDAB vs WFCL Comparison
Open Charts CDAB vs WFCLBanner chart's image
Coeur D Alene Ban
Price$16.79
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
1867 Western Financial
Price$5526.00
Change+$1.00 (+0.02%)
Volume$33
CapitalizationN/A
CDAB vs WFCL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDAB vs. WFCL commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDAB is a Buy and WFCL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CDAB: $16.79 vs. WFCL: $5526.00)
Brand notoriety: CDAB and WFCL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDAB: 44% vs. WFCL: 129%
Market capitalization -- CDAB: $0 vs. WFCL: $0
CDAB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. WFCL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWFCL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WFCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDAB is a better buy in the long-term than WFCL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDAB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFCL’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDAB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WFCL’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDAB is a better buy in the short-term than WFCL.

Price Growth

CDAB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while WFCL (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDAB YTD gains are higher at: 38.990 vs. WFCL (-3.019).
CDABWFCLCDAB / WFCL
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.990-3.019-1,292%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDAB vs WFCL: Fundamental Ratings
CDAB
WFCL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFCL's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDAB (89). This means that WFCL’s stock grew significantly faster than CDAB’s over the last 12 months.

WFCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDAB (100). This means that WFCL’s stock grew similarly to CDAB’s over the last 12 months.

WFCL's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDAB (100). This means that WFCL’s stock grew similarly to CDAB’s over the last 12 months.

CDAB's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as WFCL (61). This means that CDAB’s stock grew similarly to WFCL’s over the last 12 months.

CDAB's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WFCL (100). This means that CDAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WFCL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDABWFCL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJFCX37.96N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Growth C
ARAOX11.39N/A
N/A
Aristotle/Saul Global Eq A
BKRDX8.10-0.02
-0.25%
iShares Developed Real Estate Idx K
TWQZX15.09-0.09
-0.59%
Transamerica Large Cap Value I2
VSSVX13.05-0.16
-1.21%
VALIC Company I Small Cap Special Val

CDAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDAB has been loosely correlated with CMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDAB jumps, then CMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDAB
1D Price
Change %
CDAB100%
+0.24%
CMHF - CDAB
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
WTBFA - CDAB
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RSNHF - CDAB
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.41%
KEY - CDAB
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
WFCL - CDAB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WFCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WFCL and OTTW have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFCL and OTTW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFCL
1D Price
Change %
WFCL100%
N/A
OTTW - WFCL
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBN - WFCL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBIN - WFCL
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
CDAB - WFCL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
EXCH - WFCL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More